The comparison of the efficacy of three different risk- scoring systems on predicting the mortality rates of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorDemirdaş, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorAtılgan, Kivanç
dc.contributor.authorAltınay, Levent
dc.contributor.authorÇetin, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorEr, Zafer Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorÇiçekçioğglu, Ferit
dc.contributor.authorBardakçı, Hasmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:29:12Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:29:12Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We aimed to compare the efficacy of three different well-known and commonly used mortalityrisk-scoring systems and to provide a more suitable scoring system for our patient population.Material-Method: A total of 2120 patients who had undergone a CABG operation in Türkiye Yüksek İhtisasHospital Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic between January 2003 – December 2004 included in this study. The inhospitaldeaths and the deaths in postoperative 30 days were accepted as mortality. The patients were dividedinto low, moderate and high-risk groups as the risk scoring systems prerequisites. The predicted mortalityrates by the risk scoring systems and the observed mortality rates were compared.Results: The observed mortality rates and the predicted mortality rates by EuroSCORE were similar betweenthe groups (p>0.05). The observed mortality rates of low and moderate risk groups were significantly lowerthan the predicted mortality rates with Parsonnet risk scoring system (p<0.001). In the high-risk group, theobserved mortality rates were not significantly different from the predicted mortality rates with the same riskscoring system (p>0.05). The predicted mortality rates with Ontario Province Risk (OPR) scoring system andobserved mortality rates in the low risk group were significantly different (p<0.001). In the moderate and highrisk groups, the observed mortality rates and predicted mortality rates with the OPR were not significantlydifferent (p>0.05).Conclusion: The EuroSCORE risk scoring system results were similar to the results in the literature. It is areliable way of risk prediction for the patients undergoing CABG surgery in our region.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.16919/bozoktip.422060
dc.identifier.endpage98en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-4006
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage92en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid367755en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.16919/bozoktip.422060
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/367755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/10327
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBozok Tıp Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of the efficacy of three different risk- scoring systems on predicting the mortality rates of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graftingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu