Comparison of alternative nutrition practices in intensive care patients in terms of mortality and malnutrition

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAtayan, Yahya
dc.contributor.authorErtınmaz Özkan, Ayşegül
dc.contributor.authorAksakal, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorBenli, Ali Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan Sevencan, Nurhayat
dc.contributor.authorErdoğan, Mehmet Ali
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:32:06Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:32:06Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIt is important to ensure proper nutrition to prevent malnutrition, mortality and the development of metabolic disorders in followed up patients in the intensive care unit. In case the patients gastrointestinal tract starts functioning, enteral feeding should be started in the early period. Patients should be given parenteral support when the gastrointestinal tract does not work. In this study, we compared the mortality, malnutrition and metabolic parameters of patients who received nutritional support via nasogastric catheter, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and total parenteral nutrition. We retrospectively analyzed 117 patients’ data with no oral intake in the intensive care unit. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to nutritional practices. Group 1included 62 patients with PEG, group 2 included 28 patients with NG and group 3 had 27 patients with TPN support. In the comparison of mortality between groups, there was a significant decrease in PEG fed patients (p <0.001). There was also a significant decrease in mortality of NG group when compared to TPN group (p<0.01, Table2). In malnutrition comparison, serum albumin levels were significantly higher in PEG fed patients than in other groups (Table 3, p <0.03). There were significant improvements in metabolic parameters in the PEG group patients. We suggest that nutritional support should be provided to serious patients in intensive care unit as soon as possible in order to reduce morbidity, mortality and malnutrition, and we think that PEG procedure is safer and more effective nutritional practice than other procedures.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/medscience.2019.08.9019
dc.identifier.endpage220en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage218en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid308484en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2019.08.9019
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/308484
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/11365
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMedicine Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of alternative nutrition practices in intensive care patients in terms of mortality and malnutritionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu