COMPARISON OF RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN MULTIPLE CALYCEAL STONES: A MATCH PAIR ANALYSIS OF 190 CASES

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Ozer
dc.contributor.authorAykac, Aykut
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:12:18Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:12:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The current nephrolithiasis guidelines have no recommendation about multiple calyceal stones treatment. We aimed to compare the results of two effective methods of RIRS and PNL operations in the treatment of multicalyx stones. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent RIRS or PNL for multicalyx stones between September 2014 and May 2019 in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively In both groups, stone-free and complication rates, hospital stay, scopy times, and operation times were examined. In RIRS group, the number of sessions and total stone-free rates at the end of each session were evaluated separately. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients in the RIRS group, and 103 patients in the PNL group were evaluated. After the match pair 1: 1, data of 95 patients were selected in each group. Stone burden, number, density, ASA scores, BMI were similar in both groups. At the end of the first session RIRS, 59 (62.1%) patients became stonefree, while in the PNL group 73 (76.8%) patients (p: 0.027). The statistical analysis showed that the stone-free rates obtained in the second sessions in the RIRS group were similar to those of the PNL group. After a total of 124 sessions of RIRS, a stone-free rate of 8 7 . 1% was achieved by 1.3 sessions on average. CONCLUSION: At least two session of RIRS is as effective as PNL on multiple calyceal stones. Stage RIRS can be an alternative to PNL at multicalyceal renal stones.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-0614
dc.identifier.issn1576-8260
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33650540en_US
dc.identifier.startpage247en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/8679
dc.identifier.volume74en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000665459500010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIniestares, S.A.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchivos Espanoles De Urologiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMulticalyceal renal stonesen_US
dc.subjectRetrograde intrarenal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subjectUrolithiasis treatmenten_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN MULTIPLE CALYCEAL STONES: A MATCH PAIR ANALYSIS OF 190 CASESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu