Borrowing and Transplant in South Asian Constitutionalism: Comparative Analysis

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridHasan, Abu Saleh Mohammad Mahmudul/0000-0001-8833-5101
dc.contributor.authorAkon, Md. Zobayer
dc.contributor.authorHasan, A. S. M. Mahmudul
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Md Minhajul Abedin
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:07:47Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:07:47Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe study at hand posits that the phenomenon of constitutional borrowing and transplant in South Asia is evident in both big-C and small-C constitutional frameworks. This text submits that the demonstration of shared constitutional features encourages borrowing through constitutional similarities. The journey of constitutional formation in South Asia following decolonisation is frequently infused with global commitment to rights. The growing significance of international law and globalisation has contributed to the upsurge of constitutional transplants as a trend in South Asia. The present research illustrates how the rise of judicial activism in favour of welfare for average citizens in South Asia functions as a precursor to the adoption of constitutional borrowing. The assertion is put forth that when extra-constitutionalism takes hold, the constitutional behavioural patterns in this region remain homogeneous. Therefore, lending and borrowing occur in two distinct ways: plausibly and abusively. Several factors, such as colonial legacy, legal education, and the active role of constitutional experts in the workflow of constitutionmaking, contribute to the increase in constitutional borrowing and transplantation in South Asia. This argument proposes that the consideration of context specificity is imperative in the study of comparative public law and should not be brushed aside. Simultaneously, judicial art that considers globalisation is more beneficial to justice than parochialism.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/ppil.2023.44.1.13062158
dc.identifier.endpage196en_US
dc.identifier.issn2651-5377
dc.identifier.issn2667-4114
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage149en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2023.44.1.13062158
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/7176
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001271476900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPublic and Private International Law Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional Borrowingen_US
dc.subjectInternational Constitutionalismen_US
dc.subjectLegal Transplanten_US
dc.subjectPublic Interest Litigationen_US
dc.subjectSouth Asiaen_US
dc.titleBorrowing and Transplant in South Asian Constitutionalism: Comparative Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu