Comparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSELMI, VOLKAN/0000-0003-2605-9935
dc.authoridKarakoyunlu, Nihat/0000-0002-6680-9860
dc.contributor.authorSari, Sercan
dc.contributor.authorCakici, Mehmet Caglar
dc.contributor.authorKartal, Ibrahim Guven
dc.contributor.authorSelmi, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Harun
dc.contributor.authorOzok, Hakki Ugur
dc.contributor.authorKarakoyunlu, Ahmet Nihat
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:08:26Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:08:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser lithotripsy is used in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery. Fragmentation is made with a certain value of pulse energy (Joule) and frequency (Hertz) in Holmium laser lithotripsy and the multiplication of these values gives us total power (Watt). Devices with maximum power of 20 Watt and 30 Watt are used in clinical practice. We want to compare the efficiency, safety and pain scores of the lithotripsy made below 20 Watt and over 30 Watt with 30 Watt laser device. Materials and methods: 60 patients who had 2-3 cm sized kidney stones and operation planned were prospectively divided into three groups. Groups were random identified. In the first group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Watt power with 20 Watt laser device. In the second group, fragmentation was performed below 20 Wan power with 30 Watt laser device. In the third group, fragmentation was performed over 20 Watt power with 30 Watt laser device. Demographic, stone, intraoperative and postoperative data were recorded. We compared these groups regarding efficiency, safety and pain score. Results: For demographic and stone data, there was a statistically significant difference only for stone number. For intraoperative and postoperative data, there was a statistically significant difference only for ureteral access sheath usage between the groups. Success was lower than the other groups in Group I. Conclusions: Success was higher in groups using 30 Watt laser device. There was not statistically significantly difference between complications and pain. 30 Watt laser device is safe and efficient in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/aiua.2020.2.149
dc.identifier.endpage152en_US
dc.identifier.issn1124-3562
dc.identifier.issn2282-4197
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32597122en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087253676en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage149en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2020.2.149
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/7538
dc.identifier.volume92en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000612201300021en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPagepress Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchivio Italiano Di Urologia E Andrologiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectKidney stoneen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectSafetyen_US
dc.subjectWatten_US
dc.titleComparison of the efficiency, safety and pain scores of holmium laser devices working with 20 watt and 30 watt using in retrograde intrarenal surgery: One center prospective studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu