CERVICAL PROPRIOCEPTION AND VESTIBULAR FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH NECK PAIN AND CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

dc.contributor.authorApaydin, A.S.
dc.contributor.authorSöylemez, E.
dc.contributor.authorGünes, M.
dc.contributor.authorSöylemez, T.G.
dc.contributor.authorApaydin, Z.K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate cervical proprioceptive input and vestibular system function in patients with cervicogenic headaches (CGH). In addition, this study aimed to determine whether abnormal proprioceptive or vestibular inputs are effective in the emergence of cervicogenic dizziness. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with CGH and 25 healthy individuals were included in this study. Participants were asked about their recent falls. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate headache severity. Furthermore, static posturography, dizziness handicap index (DHI), neck disability index, subjective visual vertical, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), and cervical joint position error test (CJPET) were applied to the participants. Results: Patients with CGH had more falls in the last year than the control group (p<0.05). DHI, standing with eyes closed on a foam surface, cVEMP, and CJPET scores were worse in patients with CGH than in healthy individuals (p<0.05). The CJPET score of patients with CGH who reported cervicogenic dizziness was worse than that of patients with CGH who did not report dizziness (p<0.05). However, no difference in cVEMP findings was observed between patients with CGH and those without dizziness (p>0.05). Conclusion: It was determined that there were abnormalities in both cervical and vestibular inputs in patients with CGH. However, abnormal cervical proprioceptive inputs, not vestibular responses, were found to play a role in the mechanism of cervicogenic dizziness. ©Copyright 2024 The Author. Published by Galenos Publishing House on behalf of Turkish Spine Society.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/jtss.galenos.2024.75047
dc.identifier.endpage118en_US
dc.identifier.issn1301-0336
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203249459en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2024.75047
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/8889
dc.identifier.volume35en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Publishing Houseen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Turkish Spinal Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectbalanceen_US
dc.subjectCervicogenic headacheen_US
dc.subjectneck painen_US
dc.subjectproprioceptionen_US
dc.subjectvestibularen_US
dc.titleCERVICAL PROPRIOCEPTION AND VESTIBULAR FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH NECK PAIN AND CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE: A COMPARATIVE STUDYen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar