An experimental investigation on the failure loads of the mono and bi-adhesive joints

dc.authoridoz, ozkan/0000-0002-9833-429X
dc.contributor.authorOz, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Halil
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:02:40Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:02:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBi-adhesive (or mixed-adhesive) joint is an alternative stress-reduction technique for adhesively bonded lap joints. In this work, an experimental study was performed to assess the effect of bi-adhesive bondline on the failure load of mono-adhesive and bi-adhesive single-lap joints. The first step in the experimental study related to mono-adhesive joint, the overlap length was checked using the Global yielding criteria. For the selected overlap length, failure loads of AV138, Araldite 2015 and DP-8005 mono-adhesive joints were determined. It was seen that the highest failure load occurred in the Araldite 2015 mono-adhesive joint. Secondly, the bi-adhesive joints were considered as two different adhesive combinations (AV138+2015, AV138+DP-8005). An interesting result was obtained that the considered bi-adhesive joints with two different adhesive combinations (AV138+2015, AV138+DP-8005) give joint strengths higher than the joint strengths of the adhesives used individually, even if ductile adhesive has a joint strength higher than that of the stiff adhesive. In the last step of this study, experimental investigation was then focused on the determination of optimum bond-length ratio for the bi-adhesive joint. Optimum bond-length ratio for bi-adhesive joint was then investigated using three ratios (0.3, 0.5, 0.7). It is concluded that the adhesive type and the bond-length ratio play an important role in the bi-adhesive bondline. Comparisons of the experimentally determined failure loads and shear strengths with available closed-form solutions were also carried out. Experimental failure loads were in good agreement with those obtained from the Volkersen method and Global yielding criteria.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1264661
dc.identifier.endpage2270en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue19-20en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85001070125en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2251en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1264661
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/5630
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000404255100012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adhesion Science and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBi-adhesive jointen_US
dc.subjectexperimental failure loaden_US
dc.subjectsingle-lap jointen_US
dc.subjectfracture surfacesen_US
dc.titleAn experimental investigation on the failure loads of the mono and bi-adhesive jointsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar