The alternative version of J-curve hypothesis testing: Evidence between the USA and Canada

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKaramelikli, Huseyin/0000-0001-7622-0972
dc.authoridGOCER, ISMET/0000-0001-6050-1745
dc.contributor.authorOngan, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKaramelikli, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorGocer, Ismet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:02:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to eliminate an embedded data bias in testing the J-curve hypothesis in relevant literature. In all previous trade models about the J-curve, the bilateral trade balance (BTB) ratio, as the dependent variable, is generated and used based on total exports data, i.e. as total exports over total import. However, total exports are the sum of domestic exports and re-exports, and some countries also re-export to their partners. Furthermore, the dynamics and impacts of changing exchange rates on export volumes of domestically produced goods may differ from those on re-exported goods. Therefore, in this study, in testing the asymmetric J-curve hypothesis, we, for the first time, re-define two new proposed forms of BTBs, namely, domestic-export-based J-curve hypothesis BTB and re-export-based J-curve hypothesis BTB, based on domestic exports and re-exports, respectively, for USA-Canada trade. The main finding shows that the numbers of industries that support the asymmetric J-curve concerning these two forms of BTBs are entirely different. While the J-curve is supported by domestic-export-based J-curve hypothesis BTB for 27 industries, it is supported by re-export-based J-curve hypothesis BTB for 38. This support is 22 for the total-export-based J-curve hypothesis BTB.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09638199.2022.2155689
dc.identifier.endpage1185en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-8199
dc.identifier.issn1469-9559
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85144153574en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1130en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2022.2155689
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/5701
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000897085600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Trade & Economic Developmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectJ-curveen_US
dc.subjectnonlinear ARDLen_US
dc.subjectnew forms of bilateral trade balancesen_US
dc.titleThe alternative version of J-curve hypothesis testing: Evidence between the USA and Canadaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu