Apical extrusion of debris when using OneCurve, ProTaper Next and TruNatomy in curved canals

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKocak, Sibel/0000-0003-2354-7108
dc.authoridOzdemir, Olcay/0000-0001-8867-1551
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Ezgi
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Olcay
dc.contributor.authorSaglam, Baran Can
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Mustafa Murat
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:06:28Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:06:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. The extrusion of apical debris is related to various factors, and may be affected by varia-tions in technique or instrumentation system. Although the extrusion cannot be completely prevented, it is crucial to minimize the amount of extruded material. Objectives. The present study aimed to compare apical debris extrusion by the novel TruNatomy (TRN), OneCurve (OC) and ProTaper Next (PTN) instruments in curved root canals.Material and methods. A total of 60 multi-rooted human mandibular molar teeth with moderate and severe curvature were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups. The root canals were prepared with the OC, TRN and PTN files. For collecting the debris extruded through the apical foramen, Eppendorf tubes were used. After the vaporizing period, the tubes were re-weighed, and the amount of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. Statistical analysis was performed with the Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The statistical significance level was set atp < 0.05.Results. The least amount of debris was extruded with TRN and the greatest with PTN, but the difference between the groups was not significant (p = 0.257).Conclusions. All instrumentation systems were associated with debris extrusion. The tested file systems presented similar results in terms of apical debris extrusion in curved canals. The novel TRN system demon-strated promising results, comparable to OC and PTN.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.17219/dmp/133070
dc.identifier.endpage426en_US
dc.identifier.issn1644-387X
dc.identifier.issn2300-9020
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37750735en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85172205829en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/133070
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/6844
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001081836200002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWroclaw Medical Univen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDental and Medical Problemsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOne Curveen_US
dc.subjectProTaper Nexten_US
dc.subjectTruNatomyen_US
dc.subjectapical extrusionen_US
dc.subjectendodontic instrumentationen_US
dc.titleApical extrusion of debris when using OneCurve, ProTaper Next and TruNatomy in curved canalsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu