Comparative analysis of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBURLUKKARA, SALIH/0000-0002-2149-0163
dc.contributor.authorBurlukkara, Salih
dc.contributor.authorKabalak, Afife Ayla
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Alpay
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Ozer
dc.contributor.authorAykac, Aykut
dc.contributor.authorOzok, Hakki Ugur
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T15:51:03Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T15:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective We aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of combined spinalepidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous stone surgery prospectively. Materials and methods The study prospectively included patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy with general anesthesia (Group.1) or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (Group.2) at the Department of Urology, Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk University. between December 2018 and December 2019. The effect of the anesthesia technique on the comfort and satisfaction of the operating room personnel, surgeon and anesthesia team were prospectively evaluated and recorded. Results During the postoperative period, the spinal anesthesia group had a significantly lower visual analog score than the general anesthesia group. No patient in either group required narcotic analgesics during the postoperative period. In terms of overall satisfaction scores, the surgeon performing the surgical procedure had a significantly higher satisfaction score in the general anesthesia group than in the CSEA group. The score was considered good in the general anesthesia group and moderate in the CSEA group. Personnel satisfaction was higher in the patient group that underwent CSEA. In the general anesthesia group, the score was considered to be average. In the CSEA group, the satisfaction score was considered good, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The anesthesia team's satisfaction score was moderate, with no significant difference between the CSEA and general anesthesia groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion PCNL under CSEA can be performed safely in certain individuals. Different anesthetic techniques may have varied levels of satisfaction among the surgical team.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKarabuk Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo acknowledgments.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00345-024-04977-4
dc.identifier.issn0724-4983
dc.identifier.issn1433-8726
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38668757en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85191375940en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04977-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/3860
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001210546000002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Urologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKidneyen_US
dc.subjectStoneen_US
dc.subjectPercutaneousen_US
dc.subjectAnesthesiaen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfactionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu