ENERGY, EXERGY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (3E) ASSESSMENTS OF VARIOUS REFRIGERANTS IN THE REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS WITH INTERNAL HEAT EXCHANGER

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridyildiz, gokhan/0000-0001-6039-9226
dc.authoridAgbulut, Umit/0000-0002-6635-6494
dc.contributor.authorGurel, Ali Etem
dc.contributor.authorAgbulut, Umit
dc.contributor.authorErgun, Alper
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Gokhan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:06:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:06:27Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractA comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a refrigeration system with an internal heat exchanger was reported for four various refrigerants as an alternative to R134a. The preferred refrigerants in this paper have zero ozone-depleting potential and fairly low global warming potential value compared with reference R134a. These refrigerants are from both the HC group (R290 and R600a) and the HFO group (R1234yf and R1234ze(E)). Basically, the refrigeration system consists of a compressor, condenser, evaporator, expansion valve, and internal heat exchanger as well. Energy-exergy analyses and environmental impact assessments depending on the compressor energy consumptions are evaluated in the current study. The system performance was theoretically carried out at two different evaporation temperatures of 0 and -8 degrees C. Based on the obtained results from this study, the highest performance was achieved in R600a from HC group refrigerants and R1234ze(E) from HFO group refrigerants. As compared with R134a, in the COP value of R600a an increase of 3.2% at the evaporation temperature of 0 degrees C and 3.4% for the evaporation temperature of -8 degrees C was achieved. On the other hand, the COP value for R1234yf was decreased by 2% at the evaporation temperature of 0 degrees C and by 2.57% at the evaporation temperature of -8 degrees C. Considering the CO2 emissions, R600a was located at the first order in terms of the lowest CO2 emissions and R1234ze(E) follows R600a. In conclusion, R600a presented the highest performance compared with R134a in a refrigeration system with an internal heat exchanger.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1615/HeatTransRes.2020033716
dc.identifier.endpage1041en_US
dc.identifier.issn1064-2285
dc.identifier.issn2162-6561
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087983638en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1615/HeatTransRes.2020033716
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/6824
dc.identifier.volume51en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000557881000003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBegell House Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHeat Transfer Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectrefrigerationen_US
dc.subjectenergy and exergy analysisen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental assessmenten_US
dc.subjectenergy consumptionen_US
dc.subjectCO2en_US
dc.titleENERGY, EXERGY, AND ENVIRONMENTAL (3E) ASSESSMENTS OF VARIOUS REFRIGERANTS IN THE REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS WITH INTERNAL HEAT EXCHANGERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu