Effect of various volume syringes on solution delivery time using conventional irrigation technique in 0.04 tapered preparations of single straight root canals: An ex vivo study

dc.contributor.authorTeja, K.
dc.contributor.authorRamesh, S.
dc.contributor.authorChoudhari, S.
dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, O.
dc.contributor.authorJanani, K.
dc.contributor.authorJose, J.
dc.contributor.authorVasundhara, K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The important aspect of endodontic treatment is root canal irrigation. Although agitation systems proved to have enhanced irrigant wall interactions, syringe needle-based delivery systems still play a significant role during the preparatory phases of root canal treatment. The current study aimed to evaluate the time taken for the irrigant delivery during conventional syringe irrigation using different volume syringes in different root canal preparations. Materials and Methods: Two hundred extracted single-rooted premolars with approximately round canals were randomly instrumented to preferred apical preparation sizes using 0.4 tapered Hyflex-CM rotary Ni-Ti instruments and randomly divided as follows: Group I, instrumentation to size 40, 0.04 taper (n = 50); Group II, instrumentation to size 30, 0.04 taper (n = 50); Group III, instrumentation to size 25, 0.04 taper (n = 50); and Group IV, instrumentation to size 20, 0.04 taper (n = 50). Fifty operators were chosen for the experimentation. They were asked to irrigate the prepared specimens using different volume syringes. The entire irrigant delivery time was recorded by a head nurse using a stopwatch, and the values were calibrated and statistically analyzed. Results: Group I recorded significantly lesser time for irrigant delivery during manual syringe needle irrigation (P = 0.005) compared to other groups. Conclusion: Irrigation delivery time was less in 40/0.04 taper preparations, using 1 ml volume syringes. © 2023 Saudi Endodontic Journal | Published by Wolters Kluwer-Medknow.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/sej.sej_15_22
dc.identifier.endpage56en_US
dc.identifier.issn1658-5984
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147224692en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage51en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_15_22
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/8897
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectirriganten_US
dc.subjectroot canal preparationen_US
dc.subjectrotary instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectsyringe needleen_US
dc.titleEffect of various volume syringes on solution delivery time using conventional irrigation technique in 0.04 tapered preparations of single straight root canals: An ex vivo studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar