Effectiveness of STOPP/START criteria in primary prevention of polypharmacy and under-treatment in older patients
dc.authorid | engin, velittin selcuk/0000-0002-6338-4748 | |
dc.authorid | Benli, Ali Ramazan/0000-0003-0039-1497 | |
dc.authorid | Ersoy, Suleyman/0000-0003-0001-9329 | |
dc.contributor.author | Pala, Emin | |
dc.contributor.author | Ersoy, Suleyman | |
dc.contributor.author | Engin, Velittin Selcuk | |
dc.contributor.author | Benli, Ali Ramazan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-29T16:00:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-29T16:00:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.department | Karabük Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Aim of the study. - STOPP/START criteria appear to be a useful tool to curb inappropriate prescribing (IP), which encompasses errors of both, over and under-treatment. This study aimed to find out whether application of STOPP/START reduces the IP effectively in primary care. Methods. - This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in two family health centers (FHCs) in Istanbul. All older adults who applied to FHCs between 01-07-2018 and 01-072020 were enrolled. The potential inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescription omissions (PPOs) were identified according to STOPP/START version 2 criteria. Mean drug consumptions before and after STOPP/START were compared using Student's t-test. Results. - Among 1023 participants there were 626 females and 397 males. The mean age was 73.33 +/- 7.30 years. The number of the patients seen at FHCs was 657 (64.2%) while 366 (35.8%) of them were visited at home. Of the patients, 383 (37.8) were 75 years old or older and 631 (62.2%) of them were under 75. Overall number of drugs consumed per patient was 5.49 +/- 3.93 while it was 6.01 +/- 3.71 and 4.55 +/- 4.138 for outpatients and home patients respectively (p < 0.001). By application of STOPP criteria, among the 5616 medications consumed by the overall patients, 881(%15.6) of them were found to be potentially inappropriate. 424 (41.4%) patients were using at least one PIM. This ratio was 354 (53.8%) in outpatients and 70 (19%) in home patients. START criteria identified 380 (%7.4) PPOs. There were 246 (24.0%) patients at least with one PPO; 155 (42.3%) of whom were home patients and 91 (13.8%) were outpatients. Regarding the age groups; PIM ratio was 35.5% in patients under 75 and 52.1% over 75 whereas PPO ratio was 22.5% under 75 and 26.8% over 75. Conclusion. - This study supports the data reporting the effectiveness of STOPP/START criteriain primary care units in implementing appropriate prescription criteria. (C) 2021 Societe francaise de pharmacologie et de therapeutique. Published by Elsevier MassonSAS. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.therap.2021.07.003 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 369 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0040-5957 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1958-5578 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 34454744 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85120646832 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 361 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2021.07.003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/5373 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 77 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000833546700013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Therapie | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | STOPP | en_US |
dc.subject | START criteria | en_US |
dc.subject | Rational drug use | en_US |
dc.subject | Primary care | en_US |
dc.subject | Polypharmacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Under-treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Effectiveness of STOPP/START criteria in primary prevention of polypharmacy and under-treatment in older patients | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |