Does Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Change the Follow-Up Strategy in Cases with Residual Cholesteatoma?
dc.authorid | DUNDAR, YUSUF/0000-0002-2975-2682 | |
dc.contributor.author | Dundar, Yusuf | |
dc.contributor.author | Akcan, Fatih Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Dilli, Alper | |
dc.contributor.author | Tatar, Emel | |
dc.contributor.author | Korkmaz, Hakan | |
dc.contributor.author | Ozdek, Ali | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-29T16:09:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-29T16:09:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.department | Karabük Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in the evaluation of recurrent cholesteatomas. MATERIALS and METHODS: Twenty-three patients undergoing second-look surgery were included in our study. There were 14 men and 9 women with ages ranging from 10 to 50. All patients underwent DW-MRI prior to second-look surgery. All magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed with a 1.5-T MRI unit using a standard 8-channel neurovascular coil. DW-MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps were included in the examination. Cholesteatoma was diagnosed on the DW-MRI as a marked hyperintense signal in comparison with brain tissue. All cases were classified as positive or negative. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of DW-MRI were 86% and 87%, respectively. The positive predictive value of DW-MRI was 92%, while the negative predictive value was 77%. CONCLUSION: The DW-MRI technique is an important and effective technique in the evaluation of residual cholesteatoma. It can be an alternative method to second-look surgery, which can spare patients repeat operations. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5152/iao.2014.216 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 62 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1308-7649 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2148-3817 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 26223720 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84941564715 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 58 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2014.216 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/7719 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000357533000013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Aves | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of International Advanced Otology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cholesteatoma | en_US |
dc.subject | diffusion-weighted imaging | en_US |
dc.subject | second look surgery | en_US |
dc.title | Does Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging Change the Follow-Up Strategy in Cases with Residual Cholesteatoma? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |