COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY AND MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridARGALI DENIZ, Mine/0000-0001-8055-9530
dc.authoridOner, Serkan/0000-0002-7802-880X
dc.contributor.authorArgali Deniz, Mine
dc.contributor.authorKose, Evren
dc.contributor.authorErcan, Meryem
dc.contributor.authorYagar, Derya
dc.contributor.authorOner, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorOzbag, Davut
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:06:41Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this investigate the effectiveness of the conventional physical therapy and Mulligan mobilization technique in the treatment of Cervicogenic Headache (CH) and to compare the effectiveness of these two methods. Methods: A total of 40 patients with CH were randomized into conventional physical therapy group (Group 1, n=20) and Mulligan mobilization group (Group 2, n=20). Neck lordosis, range of motion (ROM), Cervical Performance Tests, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index, Beck Depression Scale measurements were recorded at baseline and at two weeks after the treatment. Results: VAS, Neck Disability Index and Beck Depression Scale decreased and ROM, cervical performance and lordosis angle increased significantly in both groups (p=0.010). Conclusions: Both treatments were found to have positive effects on radiological and clinical findings of CH, but Mulligan mobilization technique was found to be more effective in all evaluations except neck extension and right lateral flexion ROM measurements.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects Unit of Inonu University [2017/925]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Unit of Inonu University (2017/925).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21653/tjpr.764779
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn2651-4451
dc.identifier.issn2651-446X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85159685925en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage13en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1157869en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.764779
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1157869
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/6989
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000924523100001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTurkey Assoc Physiotherapistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation-Turk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectHeadacheen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal Manipulationsen_US
dc.subjectNeck Painen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY AND MULLIGAN MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUE IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVICOGENIC HEADACHEen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu