Retrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease under spinal anaesthesia, a minimally invasive technique. A retrospective analysis of 1,467 cases

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorBaran, O.
dc.contributor.authorAykac, A.
dc.contributor.authorSari, S.
dc.contributor.authorAtes, A.
dc.contributor.authorOzok, U.
dc.contributor.authorSunay, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T15:54:54Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T15:54:54Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare RIRS procedures applied under general anaesthesia (GA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA) regarding success and complication rates. Materials and methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted with the data obtained from patients treated with RIRS under SA and GA at 2 centres from October 2014 until January 2018. The SA and GA groups were evaluated according to the parameters of stone-free and complication rates, postoperative pain control and length of in-hospital stay. The stone-free rates from the RIRS procedures applied with SA were evaluated by the surgeons who participated in the study. Results: A total of 1361 patients were included in the study. A stone-free rate of 84.4% was obtained in the global results: 85.3% in the SA group and 83.5% in the GA group (P = .364). No statistically significant difference was determined regarding surgeons who practiced RIRS under SA with respect to success/complication rates and operating time (P = .676). Operating time was determined as 44.2 +/- 14.2 mins in the SA group and 49.7 +/- 19.1 mins in the GA group (P = .014). Conclusions: The RIRS method can be applied safely, either under spinal anaesthesia, or under general anaesthesia. The success of RIRS under spinal anaesthesia has been shown as an independent factor regarding surgeon. It can be considered a good alternative to general anaesthesia. (C) 2019 AEU. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.acuro.2018.11.003
dc.identifier.endpage253en_US
dc.identifier.issn0210-4806
dc.identifier.issn1699-7980
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30935759en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85063464103en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage248en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2018.11.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/4347
dc.identifier.volume43en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000471838100005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isospen_US
dc.publisherEne Ediciones Slen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActas Urologicas Espanolasen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRetrograde intrarenal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectRenal stone surgeryen_US
dc.subjectAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectSuccessen_US
dc.titleRetrograde intrarenal surgery for stone disease under spinal anaesthesia, a minimally invasive technique. A retrospective analysis of 1,467 casesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu