Experimental and numerical comparative crashworthiness analysis of innovative renewable hybrid barrier with conventional roadside barriers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridApak, Mustafa Yurdabal/0000-0001-5387-3508
dc.authoridOzcanan, Sedat/0000-0002-8504-7611
dc.contributor.authorYumrutas, Halil Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorOzcanan, Sedat
dc.contributor.authorApak, Mustafa Yurdabal
dc.contributor.authorAnwer, Mohammed Jalil
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:02:52Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:02:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractGuardrails are passive safety elements used in roadside safety. They are commonly manufactured as steel and concrete. There are also guardrail systems in which wood and steel materials are used together. This study investigated the crashworthiness performance of a newly developed F-shape type renewable hybrid barrier (RHB) system consisting of wood, steel and sand components. Commonly used steel guardrail and F-shape type concrete barrier were used for performance comparison. For this, a pendulum impactor has been set up. The impact performances of the aforementioned guardrails in the pendulum assembly were determined, then tests were carried out by modelling the pendulum system in the LS-DYNA environment for full-size crash testing and calibration. Calibration and validation were performed by comparing the Finite Element (FE) results with the pendulum results. Then, to determine the crashworthiness and safety of RHBs and compare them with steel and concrete barriers, full-size finite element models were created in the TB11 test standard specified in the European roadside safety standard - EN1317. As a result of the analysis, while providing the comfort of a concrete barrier after impact, RHBs perform close to the steel barrier in terms of safety. This study will be the first step before the prospective full-scale crash analysis.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKarabuk University Coordinatorship of Research Projects [FYL-2020-2205]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by Karabuk University Coordinatorship of Research Projects under grant no. FYL-2020-2205.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13588265.2022.2075124
dc.identifier.endpage350en_US
dc.identifier.issn1358-8265
dc.identifier.issn1754-2111
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85132617273en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage334en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2022.2075124
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/5754
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000796462200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Crashworthinessen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCrashworthinessen_US
dc.subjectLS-DYNAen_US
dc.subjectpendulumen_US
dc.subjectrenewable hybrid barrieren_US
dc.subjecttimber barrieren_US
dc.titleExperimental and numerical comparative crashworthiness analysis of innovative renewable hybrid barrier with conventional roadside barriersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu