A comparison of 4 different patient groups in the treatment of trigger finger: Is treatment according to grade important?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, T.
dc.contributor.authorCicek, H.
dc.contributor.authorTuhanioglu, Ü.
dc.contributor.authorSeyfettinoglu, F.
dc.contributor.authorOgur, H.U.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:16:10Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Stenosing tenosynovitis, known as trigger finger, is one of the most commonly seen hand pathologies, causing pain and impaired function in the hand. In this study, the patients were separated into 4 groups according to the treatment applied and an evaluation was made of the efficacy of these treatment options on different grades. Material and Method: A retrospective evaluation was made of 543 patients, 301 females and 242 males, diagnosed with trigger finger affecting the A1 pulley between February 2011 and January 2015. Patient data were obtained from hospital records and the patient clinical records. The Quinnell grading system was used to grade the trigger fingers. Results: When the work modules were evaluated according to the grades and the treatments applied to the patients, with the exception of the oral NSAID group, a statistically significant improvement was determined in the work module for all grades compared to the preoperative values of the local corticosteroid, percutaneous release, and open release treatments (p<0.05). In the oral NSAID group, the post-treatment values were similar to the pre-treatment values and there was no significant difference. Discussion: In light of the data obtained in this study, it was seen that as the grade increased in trigger finger, more satisfactory results were provided by more invasive treatment options to remove the negative effects on functional performance and kinematics. © Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4328/JCAM.4948
dc.identifier.endpage101en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0720
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018728503en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4328/JCAM.4948
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/8882
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDerman Medical Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Analytical Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCorticosteroiden_US
dc.subjectPercutaneous releaseen_US
dc.subjectTrigger fingeren_US
dc.titleA comparison of 4 different patient groups in the treatment of trigger finger: Is treatment according to grade important?en_US
dc.title.alternative[Tetik parmak tedavisinde 4 farkli hasta grubunun karşilaştirilmasi: Evreye göre tedavi önemli mi?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu