Comparative evaluation of the influence of waste vegetable oil and waste animal oil-based biodiesel on diesel engine performance and emissions

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridSIMSEK, SULEYMAN/0000-0002-0593-8036
dc.authoridUslu, Samet/0000-0001-9118-5108
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorUslu, Samet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T15:57:12Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T15:57:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, the effect of biodiesel obtained from animal fats (AFBD) and vegetable biodiesel (VEBD) which is obtained from canola, safflower and waste vegetable oils by transesterification method on the performance and emissions of an air cooling, four stroke, single cylinder and direct injection compression ignition engine were investigated experimentally. In the experiments, five different fuels were used as D100 (0% Biodiesel + 100% Diesel), AFBD100 (0% Diesel + 100% Animal Biodiesel), VEBD100 (0% Diesel + 100% Vegetable Biodiesel), VEBD50 (50% Diesel + 50% Vegetable Biodiesel) and AFBD50 (50% Diesel + 50% Animal Biodiesel). As a result of the experiments, it has been determined that with the use of AFBD100 and VEBD100 fuels, the brake thermal efficiency (BTHE) value decreased while the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) increased. When analyzed in terms of exhaust emission results, the reduction of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) and smoke emissions compared to D100 was determined by the use of AFBD100 and VEBD100 fuels, while an increase in nitrogen oxide (NOx) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions occurred. When the graphs obtained from AFBD and VEBD fuels are examined, it is clearly seen that VEBD-containing fuel mixtures give better results in terms of both performance and emissions. Finally, if VEBD-containing fuels are compared within themselves, the VEBD50 is better in terms of performance, while VEBD100 has given better results in terms of emissions.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118613
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361
dc.identifier.issn1873-7153
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087786016en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118613
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/4676
dc.identifier.volume280en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000562046700006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofFuelen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiesel engineen_US
dc.subjectTransesterificationen_US
dc.subjectWaste animal fat biodieselen_US
dc.subjectVegetable biodieselen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectEmissionen_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of the influence of waste vegetable oil and waste animal oil-based biodiesel on diesel engine performance and emissionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu