Additive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorEvlen, H.
dc.contributor.authorZiyamukhamedova, U.
dc.contributor.authorJuraev, D.
dc.contributor.authorAbdukarimov, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-29T16:21:05Z
dc.date.available2024-09-29T16:21:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentKarabük Üniversitesien_US
dc.description5th International Scientific Conference on Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering, CONMECHYDRO 2023 -- 26 April 2023 through 28 April 2023 -- Tashkent -- 190755en_US
dc.description.abstractAdditive manufacturing (AM) is the owner of a huge potential as a manufacturing technology in fabricating functional implants, and scaffolds for biomedical applications. AM, which includes 3D printing (3DP) and 3D bioprinting, can be the solution to produce several needs such as scaffolds/implants, tissue or organs, or medical devices by combining different biomaterials with nanomaterials. Titanium and its alloys and Polylactic acid (PLA) are commonly used in bone tissue repair with their superior bio-functionality. The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has enabled the fabrication of porous titanium and polymer composite scaffolds with controllable microstructures, which is regarded as an effective method for promoting rapid bone repair. An electronic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Elsevier, Embase, and other numerous databases up to December 2021 which are accessed by Karabuk university. To evaluate the possibility of bias and methodological quality, the SYRCLE tool and the last version of the CAMARADES list were used, respectively, a meta-analysis could not be performed. This systematic review is aimed to evaluate the common biomedical potential of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V (Ti64) and PLA matrix scaffold for repairing bone defects to investigate the influential factors that might affect its osteogenic availability. The most ideal parameters for designing the Ti64 scaffold were found to be a pore size of around 300-400 m and porosity of 60-70%, while PLA scaffolds show 350-400 m and nearly the same percentage in porosity as Ti64. © 2023 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/e3sconf/202340103040
dc.identifier.issn2555-0403
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169672497en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340103040
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14619/9541
dc.identifier.volume401en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEDP Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofE3S Web of Conferencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleAdditive manufacturing of bionanomaterials for biomedical applications based on TI6AL4V and PLA: a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeConference Objecten_US

Dosyalar